Why export-to-draft often becomes the bottleneck
- Score values are re-entered across tables, narrative, and appendices.
- Descriptor wording drifts when copied between sections.
- Corrections found near finalization trigger avoidable rework.
Workflow Guide
Q-global Report Export Workflow for Clean, Faster Drafting
Most delay happens after scoring, when data has to be transferred into report sections. This workflow helps you convert verified Q-global exports into structured drafts, with fewer manual handoffs and fewer late-stage corrections.
Pre-draft verification checklist
- Confirm client identifiers and referral context.
- Confirm expected test battery and score fields are present.
- Confirm descriptor language aligns with reported values.
Post-draft QA checklist
- Table values match narrative statements.
- Names and pronouns remain consistent across sections.
- Recommendations are linked to documented findings.
A safer workflow sequence
- Import Q-global export data and lock mapping before drafting.
- Generate structured section drafts from verified findings.
- Run consistency checks before final clinical review.
- Finalize language and export only after clinician sign-off.
FAQ
Do I need to replace my current scoring platform?
No. This workflow is designed to fit what happens after scoring, so you can keep your current testing and scoring process.
Is this meant to generate a final report automatically?
No. It supports first-draft assembly and QA. Clinicians still review, edit, and approve final reports.
How should I measure improvement?
Track turnaround from scoring complete to first full draft, QA correction count, and total editing burden per report.
Need this tailored to your current Q-global export workflow?
Request access and we will map setup to your report format and high-volume case types.
Request access